As scientists, we debated whether "winning" via a character assassination—regardless of the truth—compromised the integrity of our own scientific achievement. 4. Resolution and Action Taken
This report outlines the ethical conflict and subsequent resolution regarding the academic misconduct of Drs. Campbell and Pemberton during their Nobel Prize campaign for Super-Asymmetry. [S12E21] The Plagiarism Schism
Utilizing the evidence would effectively disqualify our competitors and secure our path to the Nobel Prize. As scientists, we debated whether "winning" via a
While competing for the Nobel Prize for our theory of Super-Asymmetry, we were approached by , who provided evidence that Dr. Pemberton’s doctoral thesis contained significant portions of uncredited material. we were approached by
We chose not to leak the evidence to the Nobel Committee.
Barry Kripke, via personal academic networks. 3. Ethical Deliberations